Shoe dissection posts are interesting - they allow you to see the material and construction that are so often talked about, touted around, but seldom substantiated. ShoeGazing blog once had a comparison of Loake, Carmina and Paolo Scafora (here).
Five years later, I still haven't been able to come across a post as informative as above - when it comes to dissecting and verifying various manufacturers' claims. Arguably, the general reluctance and inability of the average consumer to take apart his or her own shoes is conducive to such (shady) mistakes as passing something else as handwelted.
Meccariello shoes (Instagram, Webshop) have intrigued me for the past few years. I was first introduced to the brand by shoe enthusiasts bamboo and chobochobo. The of course it was like a Pandora's box: once started, it was impossible to stop buying.
Nevertheless, with a scientific background, @shirtingfantasy has been taught not to believe in others - unless claims are objectively refutable and reasonably verified. Shoe makers make a lot of claims -
- We use the best part of the hide
- We use Blake / Goodyear / Norwegian / handwelted / modified handwelted construction
- We use leather stiffeners
- We stitch the narrow waist by hand / machine
- and so forth...
Apart from (1) and (2), which can sometimes be refuted from the outside, e.g. wrinkles and loose grains speak against really good part of the hide, and a total lack of (obvious and hidden) stitching marks would make a stitched construction unlikely. More enthusiast-oriented features, such as "we do blind waist using the time-consuming way, not by nail or glue", or "this is close to handwelted construction, and there is no welt strip and gemming" would be quite impossible to validate from inspection of shoes alone.
Without further ado, the unprofessional, brutal, and ugly dissection of @shirtingfantasy's first pair of Meccariello shoes* -
* As to why the shoes ended up being dissected, it has something to do with quotas, family harmony etc. and we shall not discuss further
1. It's an office-based procedure. The only tool available was a pair of scissors. |
2. Attempted infiltration through the waist weakness - took quite a bit of effort |
3. Here one can see the tool used |
7. Looking between the insole and the outsole from the waist opening. There is a metal shank (not sure about the material, could be stainless steel - it felt hard and there was no rust). The outsole stitching along the waist were even and tiny - clear evidence of a machine-stitched outsole all the way to the waist (the so-called 270 degrees). The stitching used for the insole-upper connection was some sort of white thread (claimed to be linen, which @shirtingfantasy was not able to verify). There seems to be no gemming, and the "direct leather-to-leather" connection claim seems to be valid. |
Comments
Post a Comment